Charlamagne tha God slams flag-burners after Trump executive order

Radio presenter Charlamagne Tha God hit flag burners on Tuesday, and claimed that they “do not give an rattling about America.”

After months of demonstrators who burn American flags in numerous anti-Israel and anti-ICE demonstrations, President Donald Trump introduced on Monday in an government order that he ordered the lawyer common to prosecute violations of legal guidelines that embody the flagstone and pursued the flag of the primary modification.

Charlamagne, a self -described democrat, doubted the motives of protesters that burn the flag.

“I perceive that it’s free speech, however it is rather like, I’ve all the time puzzled why you wish to try this in case you are an American, in case you are a patriot, are you aware?” Asked the radio presenter. “I imply, for those who take into account your self a patriot, why would you wish to burn the American flag?”

Trump Flag Burning Government Order might flip the primary modification the wrong way up with a brand new court docket

Charlamagne positioned demonstrators of flag burners within the highlight and early whether or not it’s counterproductive to burn the flag of the nation on which they depend upon private freedoms. (Arturo Holmes/Getty photos for Comedy Facilities)

“You need the nation to truly be higher, and also you need the nation, you understand – you understand – that flag symbolizes what that nation stands for. You need that nation to truly rise up for that flag and rise up for the credo that it places there. That’s what you really need, proper?” he requested.

“I do not know, it jogs my memory like when individuals, you understand, burn the sweaters of their favourite gamers, as you are offended,” he mentioned, “however you continue to love the staff.”

When a listener referred to as in, with the argument {that a} ban on burning the flag is a violation of the constitutionally assured freedom of expression, the radio presenter revolved the query and requested why protesters would burn the flag of the nation on which they have been depending on freedom.

“I agree, however what I mentioned is, in fact I perceive free speech, in fact I’m all totally free speech,” Charlamagne mentioned. “But it surely’s simply wild to burn the flag, however then use the Structure to say you could burn the flag. As a result of burning the flag signifies that you do not give something about America. So for those who do not give something about America, you should not care in regards to the structure!”

Trump prohibits flag burning after years of riots, left-wing desecration: timeline of outdated glory cuddly

President Donald Trump signed an government order on August 25, 2025, these suspects in opposition to suspects who take the American flag. (Getty Photographs)

The caller continued his objection. “For the president to inform me that I am unable to do one thing on this nation, it means he’s a dictator,” mentioned the caller. “In any other case, the Structure won’t matter.”

“I do not agree with what the president does,” Charlamagne mentioned. “I simply say:” Let’s take a look at all sides of it, “as a result of the American flag represents an emblem of freedom and we wish this nation to keep up that freedom it guarantees. So it is simply unusual to burn the flag, however nonetheless level to the structure, democracy and freedom, and say:” That is what we wish. “

In a press release to Fox Information DigitalStated Witte Huis spokesman, Taylor Rogers, to take.”

A person spits on a burning American flag throughout an anti-seasoning protest in Los Angeles. (Oliya Scootercaster/Freedomnewstv)

Click on right here to get the Fox Information app

The Supreme Court docket dominated within the 1989 case, Texas in opposition to Johnson that the burning of the American flag is a type of symbolic speech protected by the primary modification. The chief order of Trump, which instructs the lawyer common “to pursue a lawsuit to make clear the scope of the exceptions of the primary modification” within the area of flag burning, alerts that there’ll in all probability be upcoming lawsuits that challenges the 1989 ruling.

The chief order consists of the argument that the Supreme Court docket ‘by no means dominated that the American flag disruption is being carried out in a manner that may in all probability encourage impending lawless motion or that an motion that comes right down to’ preventing phrases’ is constitutionally protected. “

Lindsay Kornick from Fox Information has contributed from this report.