DOJ allegedly tracked Democrats’ search history on Jeffrey Epstein files

Democrats within the Home of Representatives are outraged that the Division of Justice (DOJ) allegedly tracked their search historical past as they searched the Epstein information saved domestically at DOJ headquarters.

After Lawyer Normal Pam Bondi testified earlier than lawmakers at a listening to Wednesday, a photographer caught a printout of a collection of questions she introduced along with her — reportedly search knowledge from which Rep. Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash., stated they have been hers.

“Utterly inappropriate,” Jayapal advised Fox Information Digital concerning the monitored questions. “We’re going to demand that this involves an finish.”

The checklist within the picture included phrases that Jayapal had regarded up within the DOJ’s Epstein database, phrases like “Epstein sufferer checklist – all redacted” and “new Brazilian simply arrived, horny and cute, 19 years previous.”

FEDERAL JUDGE blocks lawmakers’ try and pressure DOJ’s launch of EPSTEIN FILES

Lawyer Normal Pam Bondi testifies earlier than a Home Judiciary Committee listening to on Capitol Hill in Washington, February 11, 2026, in Washington. (Tom Brenner/The Related Press)

Bondi and the DOJ didn’t instantly reply to a request for remark from Fox Information Digital.

Though the publicly obtainable DOJ Epstein Library comprises a privateness disclaimer, readers are requested to inform the company within the occasion {that a} sufferer’s id is unintentionally revealed and no point out is manufactured from any knowledge assortment.

Whereas it’s unclear what Democrats can do about their dismay over managed searches, a number of lawmakers have criticized the DOJ for what they noticed as a violation of the separation of powers.

In line with members like Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., the rating member of the Home Oversight Committee, the images would show that the DOJ is taking steps to observe the investigative efforts of members of Congress.

“The truth that they’re following us whereas we’re looking out, why would you do this?” Garcia stated Thursday.

“What explains member monitoring and what we search for?” he requested. “It would not make sense. We’re very involved concerning the course of.”

EPSTEIN VICTIMS USE SUPER BOWL COMMERCIAL TO PRESSURE PAM BONDI OVER WITHHELD FILES

In line with members like Rep. Robert Garcia, D-Calif., the rating member of the Home Oversight Committee, the images would show that the DOJ is taking steps to observe the investigative efforts of members of Congress. (Graeme Sloan/Bloomberg by way of Getty Photographs)

Lawmakers from each events have made journeys to the DOJ constructing in latest days, reviewing Epstein information that the company has saved on native units at DOJ headquarters.

Researchers together with Reps. Thomas Massie, R-Ky., Ro Khanna, D-Calif. have made the trek to the amenities in hopes of discovering how most of the information haven’t been made public by straight questioning DOJ officers concerning the information.

It’s these searches that Democrats declare are below surveillance. Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., the highest Democrat on the Home Judiciary Committee, stated he believes the company has been surveilling members of each events.

“We’ve got purpose to consider it occurred to everybody who went there they usually have been monitoring everybody’s laptop searches,” Raskin stated.

To resolve the issue, Garcia and Raskin each floated the concept that the DOJ may carry its units to the Capitol, the place lawmakers may proceed their evaluation.

“I imply, it might assist the method,” Garcia stated of the concept. “However proper now they don’t seem to be even releasing all of the information. Half of the information are being retained. We will not belief something the DOJ would say anymore,” Bondi stated.

HOUSE TAKES STEP CLOSER TO REFERRING CLINTONS ON CRIMINAL CHARGES, WITH DEMOCRATIC SUPPORT

Rep. Jamie Raskin, D-Md., Raskin stated he plans to ship a letter to the DOJ requesting extra details about the alleged surveillance. (Andrew Harnik/Getty Photographs)

Garcia famous that lawmakers consider among the information have been already redacted after they have been transferred from the FBI to the DOJ, that means the DOJ itself is probably not in charge for each redaction.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

As lawmakers debate how you can stop the gathering of future inquiries, Raskin stated he plans to ship a letter to the DOJ requesting extra details about the alleged surveillance. He declined to elucidate what else Democrats may do to rein within the DOJ, however hinted he would make an announcement within the coming days.

“I will say extra about it later,” Raskin stated.