Fate of 24% wholesale tax on marijuana before Michigan judge

By Summer season Ballentine, sballentine@detroitnews.com

Detroit — A brand new legislation imposing a 24% charge wholesale tax on marijuana retailers who will fund street upkeep will take impact within the coming weeks except a Michigan choose acts.

Choose Sima Patel of the Michigan Courtroom of Claims on Tuesday thought-about briefly blocking the tax whereas a court case making an attempt to throw out the levy is enjoying out in court docket.

Michigan voters in 2018 authorized a poll proposal to legalize leisure marijuana and impose a ten% excise tax. Laws authorized final month would add a 24% wholesale tax on high of that.

Lawmakers need taxpayer cash to assist pay for a long-term plan of about $1.9 billion. Marijuana sellers say increased taxes will elevate costs, dampen gross sales and drive layoffs within the trade.

“Hashish firms already function on skinny margins,” Rose Tantraphol, spokesperson for the Michigan Hashish Trade Affiliation, mentioned in an announcement. “They should move on will increase primarily based on this unconstitutional tax. Resulting from market elasticity, complete income will decline by roughly 14%, the Senate Finances Workplace mentioned.”

State senators authorized the tax round 3 a.m. Oct. 3 as the important thing vote in a complete deal to extend street funding and attain a brand new state price range. Democratic Governor Gretchen Whitmer signed the invoice a number of days later, and a Michigan marijuana trade group filed a lawsuit inside hours.

The Legislature’s price range companies estimate it’ll generate $420 million in extra annual income if it takes impact as deliberate on Jan. 1. Retail gross sales of leisure marijuana in Michigan final 12 months had been about $3.2 billion, in line with monthly reports from the Cannabis Regulatory Agency.

Kevin Blair, an legal professional for the Michigan Hashish Trade Affiliation, advised Patel at Tuesday’s listening to in Detroit that lawmakers had been “deliberately undermining” voters to push via the extra tax “in the course of the night time.”

“This case will not be a few struggle between Republicans and Democrats,” Blair mentioned. “It’s politicians from each events who’ve unconstitutionally subverted the need of the voters.”

“I do not assume anybody with an trustworthy face can say that voters ever anticipated regulated marijuana to be taxed at thrice (the worth of) unlawful marijuana,” Blair added.

Throughout Tuesday’s listening to, Patel centered a lot of her questions on the marijuana trade’s argument that these taxes can solely be modified if voters or a three-quarters majority of state lawmakers amend the 2018 legislation.

The voter-approved legislation “is the unique mechanism for imposing excise taxes,” marijuana trade attorneys wrote within the lawsuit.

The textual content of the 2018 legislation states that it imposed a ten% excise tax “along with all different taxes.”

Assistant Lawyer Basic Wesley Margeson, defending the state in court docket Tuesday, argued that the language of the unique voter-initiated legislation legalizing leisure marijuana supplies a gap for additional taxation of wholesale marijuana gross sales.

Blair additionally argued that the aim of the 2018 legislation was to “stifle the illicit market” by imposing a decrease excise tax charge than another states and implicitly taxing unlawful marijuana gross sales on the similar charge as authorized gross sales.

He mentioned including one other 24% tax on authorized wholesalers would make legally obtained marijuana costlier than what’s bought on the black market, undermining the unique intent of the 2018 legislation.

However Patel questioned the argument that the first goal of the voter-approved legislation was to “suppress the unlawful market.”

“Not simply suppressing the unlawful market,” she mentioned, “to create a authorized market, proper?”

Patel mentioned Tuesday she hopes to rule quickly on the trade’s request for a short lived pause on taxes, however didn’t present a selected date.

©2025 Detroit Information. Go to detroitnews.com. Distributed by Tribune Content material Company, LLC.