Forensic video expert testifies about footage of Cassie attack I Live Updates from Fox News Digital

​

For a interval of three days, the jury heard in Sean “Diddy” Combs ‘Combs’ means of his ex-assistant. The girl, who labored for Diddy from 2009 to 2017, testified below the pseudonym ‘Mia’.

The ex-assistant instructed the jury that she was ‘psychologically’ caught by the rapper, even after she not labored for him in 2017. Throughout her cross -hearing, Mia pushed again on the protection. “I by no means lied on this courtroom and I’ll by no means be in court docket,” she mentioned. “Every part I mentioned is true.”

Mia claimed that Diddy sexually abused her a number of occasions throughout her employment for the now completely different music mogul. In keeping with the previous worker, she was usually bodily and emotionally abused by Diddy and had tried to run not less than one alternative from him.

The extraordinary interrogation of Mia by Diddy’s protection led to the persecution that the cross -hearing was humiliating and embarrassing.

“Mia’s witness is essential for the persecution, as a result of it strives to determine parts of the alleged prison firm: management, exploitation and intimidation,” mentioned Felony Protection Legal professional Nicole Clean Becker, who labored with R. Kelly, to Fox Information Digital.

“The counsel can normally observe a softer method with a witness who claims sexual abuse to forestall them from not seeming sympathetic to the jury,” she defined. “Nevertheless, the distinctive place of MIA throughout the alleged firm and the width of its allegations require a stronger hand of the protection. They have to be each powerful and strategic, geared toward affordable doubt by emphasizing Mia’s voluntary work selections, her duties and her potential to go away the scenario.”

“In de zaak van R. Kelly zagen we vergelijkbare overheidstactieken, met behulp van getuigen die dicht bij de verdachte waren gepositioneerd om autoriteit en ondernemingselementen op te zetten, zelfs als die getuigen zelf geen slachtoffer waren van fysiek of seksueel misbruik. Hier, met MIA, moet de verdediging nauwkeurig confronteren en haar acties en motivaties herformuleren, terwijl ze de fijne lijn onderhouden tussen haar geloofwaardigheid en het handhaven van haar geloofwaardigheid en het onderhouden of respect. “

“In abstract, the assertive, business intercession fashion of the protection is each a response to the high-stakes nature of Mia’s testimony and a strategic effort to shift the story of exploitation and coercion to autonomy and permission. It’s a delicate steadiness, however below Rico degrading the protection should do all the things to disturb the federal government.

Maria Paronich of Fox Information has contributed to this report.