JASON CHAFFETZ: Democrats have made a fatal error opposing DOGE

Compelled to defend the indefensible, congress democrats have problem arising with rational arguments towards combating the elimination of waste, fraud and abuse uncovered by the Division of Authorities Effectivity (Doge) of Elon Musk. The mix of authorized nitpicks, private assaults and apocalyptic warnings displays a scatter shot strategy that isn’t a celebration to doge’s clear populist attraction.

An instance of April of Valor CEO Antonio Gracias, which DOGE discovered round 2.1 million sofi numbers that had been printed to non-citizens in 2024, lots of which had been used to achieve entry to social packages. Democrats have largely refused to take care of the argument and solely gives denials, deflection and advert hominem assaults.

Delaware Senator Chris Coons aroused an eye-roll from Fox Information’ Martha Maccallum when he tried to reduce the fraud in an interview of two April. Recognition of just one sort of fraud wherein the speed is claimed to be low, then Coons then turned to Advert Hominem assaults on Elon Musk.

Individuals assess the efforts of Doge and Elon Musk inside the first 100 days of the Trump administration

The Senator of Biden’s dwelling state lagged after Maccallum had pressed him on the solvency of this system and requested: “What did Democrats do to search out waste, fraud and abuse in social safety?” Coons may solely dispel himself. Democrats have completed nothing to forestall insolvency. There is no such thing as a good argument to be made.

Likewise, Senate Line Chief Chuck Schumer has problem discovering a convincing line of assaults. He has resorted to assert Trump and Musk are engaged on deep corruption and self-handling, even whereas exposing the deep corruption and self-handling of the non-profit Grift Machine of the Democrats.

Schumer’s tactic is even much less efficient within the mild of a not too long ago excavated clip from 1995 wherein Schumer himself sounds unabashedly. . . Doo. “In all places we go, individuals say, why cannot you cease unlawful immigrants and others to return right here,” says the 1995 Chuck Schumer. “And the primary reply we give our voters is once they come right here, they will get jobs, getting advantages towards the legislation due to fraud,” he says self -righteous. It appears that evidently 1995 Schumer was extra logical than this 2025 Schumer.

Apocalyptic warnings don’t appear to work both. Maryland Rep. Jamie Raskin referred to as Doge a coup that operated ‘from the shadows’. In February he submitted a Foia request wherein he and Virginia Rep. Gerry Connolly after Doge talked about as an “oligarchic techno state”. In an interview, Raskin claimed: “It’s a dystopian nightmare that unfolds earlier than our eyes.”

Click on right here for extra the opinion of Fox Information

That alarmism and severe tone instantly battle with the general public temper. Newsweek reviews that 65 p.c of Democrats helps expenditure on expenditure on expenditure. This hair -raising imaginative and prescient on authorities collapse contrasts sharply with the $ 140 billion in saving that Canine has already documented. Voters don’t see the financial savings as an existential menace.

Click on right here to get the Fox Information app

Even the mocking references from Democrats to a younger doge worker as “huge balls” solely served to make the younger man a type of folks hero.

Democrats finally make a lethal error by stopping the success of Doge and rooting the fraud with the taxpayer of the American. They appear to be for fraud and waste. And with out a viable, cheap, widespread sense different, their assaults fall on deaf ears and allow them to get essentially the most questions: “What do democrats actually stand for?”

Click on right here to learn extra from Jason Chaffetz