Little v. Hecox lawyer faces pressing question from Alito

Supreme Courtroom Justice Samuel Alito on Tuesday questioned an lawyer representing a organic male athlete within the case Little v. Hecox concerning the definitions of a lady and a lady.

Alito requested Kathleen R. Hartnett, who’s arguing the case earlier than the Supreme Courtroom on behalf of the Idaho pupil, what it meant to be a “boy or a lady or a person or a lady” when it got here to equal safety functions. Hartnett agreed {that a} faculty might have separate groups for college kids “labeled as boys” and a class of scholars labeled as women. Hartnett additionally agreed that there wanted to be “an understanding of what it means to be a boy or a lady and a person or a lady.”

CLICK HERE FOR MORE SPORTS COVERAGE ON FOXNEWS.COM

Supreme Courtroom Justice Samuel Alito testifies concerning the court docket’s finances throughout a Home subcommittee listening to on March 7, 2019 in Washington, D.C. (Chip Somodevilla/Getty Photos)

“Sorry, I misunderstood your query. I feel regardless of the underlying legislation was, the coverage, the legislation, we have to perceive how the state or the federal government interpreted that time period to determine whether or not somebody was excluded,” Hartnett stated. “We do not have a definition for the court docket. We aren’t difficult the definition right here.

“What we’re saying is the best way by which it implies in observe that males of beginning gender are categorically excluded from girls’s groups. There’s a subgroup of males of beginning gender the place it is not sensible within the pursuits of the state to try this.”

Alito then requested, “How can a court docket decide whether or not there’s discrimination based mostly on intercourse with out understanding what intercourse means for equal safety functions?”

HOUSE GOP LEADER DECLARES TRANS ATHLETES IN GIRLS’ SPORTS ‘MAJOR FORM OF BULLYING’

Home Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., addresses the gang gathered exterior the Supreme Courtroom throughout arguments over state legal guidelines banning transgender women and girls from taking part in on faculty athletic groups, Tuesday, Jan. 13, 2026, in Washington, D.C. (Jose Luis Magana/AP)

“I feel we simply know right here, we all know in precept that they’ve recognized themselves by their very own statute, Lindsay qualifies as a male by beginning gender and he or she is categorically excluded from the ladies’s groups because the statute states,” Hartnett responded. “So we take the statute’s definitions as we discover them and we do not problem them. We’re simply making an attempt to determine do they create an equal safety drawback?”

Alito then requested Hartnett a hypothetical query a couple of boy who has by no means taken puberty blockers or different medicines however thought he was a lady, and whether or not a faculty can say the boy cannot take part on a women’ sports activities workforce.

Hartnett instructed that the hypothetical was not essentially what her aspect argued.

The query is whether or not legal guidelines in Idaho and West Virginia that ban transgender athletes who determine as girls from taking part in on groups that match their gender identification discriminate on the idea of intercourse.

Within the case of Little v. Hecox, a organic male who tried to compete on the Boise State College girls’s monitor and discipline and cross nation groups alleged that Idaho’s legislation, the Equity in Ladies’s Sports activities Act, violated the Equal Safety Clause by excluding transgender girls.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD THE FOX NEWS APP

Attorneys for the states defending the bans argue that segregating sports activities based mostly on organic intercourse ensures equity and security for feminine athletes and is in keeping with Title IX’s definition of intercourse.

Comply with Fox Information Digital’s sports reporting on X and subscribe to the Fox Information Sports activities Huddle publication.