TAPE execs insist ‘not criminally liable’ in GMA’s estafa complaint

Picture: Tape Inc.

The managers of Tape Inc., who’re talked about as respondents within the P37.9 million-Estafa grievance submitted by GMA Community, saved that they don’t seem to be liable, and emphasizes that the case is a Civil legal responsibility of the manufacturing firm as an organization.

After the Kapuso community has rejected the manufacturing firm settlement In the course of the mediation classes, tape lawyer Maggie Abraham-Garduque confirmed that the grievance will likely be raffled to a different public prosecutor who will perform the provisional investigation.

“The respondents nonetheless consider that they don’t seem to be liable, as a result of this can be a civil legal responsibility of Tape as an organization and never the person shareholders who’re the respondents within the Relafa case,” she advised Inquirer.web in response to GMA’s rejection of GMA.

Within the grievance, former tape president and CEO Romeo Jalosjos, Jr., chairman Romeo Jalosjos, Sr., treasurer Seth Frederick “Bullet” Jalosjos, present CEO Malou Choa-Fagar, former SVP for Finance Michaela Magtoto and Finance Consultanta.

“The general public prosecutor who will deal with the preliminary investigation will concern a summons {that a} listening to for submitting the counter -declaration of the respondents,” the authorized adviser added.

Garduque has additionally introduced that Tape provided to repay his civil legal responsibility with a property appreciated on P39 million – which is greater than the declare within the case – however that “GMA denied the provide as a result of they need greater than this quantity.”

“GMA desires tape to regulate the entire quantity of overdue overdue tape, bUT -Tape can solely accept the quantity lined by the Relafa housing that’s P38 million, “she stated.

GMA filed a grievance for the workplace of the general public prosecutor in Quezon Metropolis in Might and accused Relafa tape by abuse of belief. The Kapuso community claimed that the manufacturing firm abused funds within the quantity of 37,941,352.56 for its working prices. /EDV